Gaining Some Perspective on the Closer Situation
|Image courtesy of Daylife via AP|
It’s interesting how temporarily unplugging from fandom can actually help gain a little perspective on the Toronto Blue Jays.
For one reason or another, I just so happened to miss most of the weekend series against the Yankees, only catching about 3-4 innings in total on TV and the radio. That time away allowed me to gain some clarity on a couple of things to do with the Blue Jays, most notably the closer situation, or the lack thereof.
I thought back to what happened last year with the Blue Jays three-headed closer coming out of Spring Training comprised of Jason Frasor, Scott Downs and Kevin Gregg. There was never really one defined closer, as Frasor started out of the gate as the ninth inning guy.
After two blown saves within the first two weeks of the season, the Blue Jays didn’t even hesitate to take the closer’s role away from Jason Frasor and bestow it upon Kevin Gregg. At the time, it seemed like a knee-jerk reaction, but most figured Gregg was signed to be the Blue Jays closer anyway, so there really wasn’t much debate on the issue.
Fast forward to this season and the tumultuous ride that has been Frank Francisco’s rise and fall and rise and fall as the Blue Jays closer. Francisco has suddenly turned from a high leverage pitcher to carving out a niche as the guy who comes in with a nine-run lead.
Last year, the club was willing to ditch Jason Frasor as the closer at their very first opportunity, and yet here is Frank Francisco being treated with kid gloves and given multiple chances to reclaim his throne as the Blue Jays closer.
I don’t know how much of a decision it was the manager’s to take Jason Frasor out of the role last year, but I think it had something partly to do with Cito Gaston and partly to do with the front office. So why are so many strings being pulled (whether it be by the Manager of the General Manager) to keep Frank Francisco around?
This leads me to believe either the front office wants Frank Francisco to grab the reins as closer because they want to build his trade value, so he can attain Type B free agent status, or so the Blue Jays can keep him around next year and beyond.
It doesn’t make sense for the Blue Jays to give Francisco chance after chance to be the closer unless they wanted him to be the closer for next year, an possibly even beyond that as well.
Something that’s become very clear with Alex Anthopoulos (and maybe even his sole weakness to date) is that when he’s determined to get a player via trade, he is willing to do almost anything to get them.
We still won’t know for another 5-7 years whether Brett Wallace for Anthony Gose was the right decision, but at the time it felt like AA had his blinders on for Gose and was going to acquire him at all costs.
It felt like a very similar scenario when the Blue Jays traded Mike Napoli for Frank Francisco; another player that was on Alex Anthopoulos’ wish list, and when he had the opportunity to get Francisco via trade, he did it.
With the way the Blue Jays are continually trying to build Frank Francisco back up, that’s why I wouldn’t be surprised at all if they re-signed him to a one-year deal with an option from 2012 and 2013.
We’ve also learned that the Silent Assassin isn’t afraid to acquire free agent compensatory picks by what some General Managers might consider as unconventional means. Need I remind anyone what happened with the man with an hour and a half stint with the Blue Jays, Miguel Olivo?
Whichever reason it is that the Blue Jays have for holding onto Frank Francisco, my instincts tell me it’s because they want him here for the long haul rather than for just the short term. Either that, or Alex Anthopoulos really doesn’t want to see one of his off-season acquisitions go belly-up.
Latest posts by Ian Hunter (see all)
- The Blue Jays’ Bullpen Needs Help Now, More Than Ever - July 24, 2016
- VIDEO: Buck Martinez Gets Candid with Shock Top ‘Unfiltered Talk’ - July 22, 2016
- Subtle Changes to Marcus Stroman’s Delivery Are Paying Off - July 21, 2016